Experienced Attorneys Upland - Accident Injury Divorce Family Law

1-855-LOMG-911Free Consultation
  • Workers Compensation
  • Personal Injury
    • Why You Need an Injury Attorney
    • Car Accident
    • Motorcycle Accident
    • Soft Tissue Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Death and Injury
  • Family Law
    • Before Filing for Divorce
    • Divorce Basics
    • Divorce Strategy
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Division of Property
    • Domestic Violence
  • Criminal Defense
    • Driving Crimes
      • DUI Laws
      • DUI Drugs
      • Unlicensed Drivers
      • Suspended License
      • Evading Arrest
      • Hit Run
      • Vehicular Manslaughter
    • Assault – Battery
    • Domestic Violence
    • Drug Crimes
    • Theft, Robbery, Burglary
    • Sex Crimes
    • Criminal Fraud
  • Bankruptcy
    • Bankruptcy Basics
    • Chapter 7
    • Chapter 13
    • Common Bankruptcy Questions
    • Do I Qualify For Bankruptcy
    • Will I Lose My Property?
  • About
    • Our Core Values
    • Other Practice Areas
      • Workers Compensation
      • Civil Litigation
      • Business Litigation
      • Bad Faith Insurance
      • Employment Law
      • Social Security
      • Special Education
      • Insurance Bad Faith
      • Wildfire Damage
      • Fire Insurance Claims
      • Discrimination and Sexual Harassment
    • Tell Us How We Did
    • Our Attorneys
      • Marc E. Grossman
    • Locations Served
      • Alta Loma
      • Chino
      • Chino Hills
      • Claremont
      • Corona
      • Diamond Bar
      • Fontana
      • Glendora
      • Mira Loma
      • Montclair
      • Ontario
      • Palm Desert
      • Pomona
      • Rancho Cucamonga
      • Riverside
      • San Bernardino
      • San Dimas
      • Upland
      • Van Nuys
    • Articles and Information
    • Testimonials
  • Contact
Home > Archives for Criminal Defense

Mar 18 2020

Theft Crimes in California

What is Theft Crime?

A theft crime is classified as an unlawful and unauthorized taking of another’s property with the intent to gain. According to California law, in order for a theft to happen, the offender must have the intent of depriving the owner of his property permanently.

Theft has different categories: larceny, embezzlement and false pretenses.

  • Larceny is the crime most commonly known as “theft.”
  • Embezzlement is the misappropriation of funds placed in the trust of someone who has lawful possession of it.
  • False pretense is when a person obtains the personal property of another through forgery or fraudulent statements with the intent of depriving the lawful owner of his property.

Theft Crimes in California

Theft is classified in California according to the reasonable and fair market value of the property stolen. The law in California penalizes several kinds of theft offenses such as:

  • Theft CrimesPetty Theft– it is considered petty theft if the amount or value stolen is $400 or less. This is a misdemeanor punishable up to six months of jail, a fine of less than $1,000, community service, probation, and counseling. If the property stolen is $50 or below and the offender had no other conviction related to theft, it is the discretion of the prosecutor if the offense will be charged with an infraction. If the offender has been previously convicted of petty theft, the prosecution may file the second offense as a felony charge rather than a misdemeanor. The penalty is up to 3 years in prison, counseling, probation or parole, fines, as well as community service.
  • Shoplifting– Proposition 47 was approved in November 2014 in which shoplifting was added to the Penal Code. An offender intending to steal any item from a retail establishment worth $950 or less is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable for up to 1 year in jail. Taking the merchandise must be done with intent to steal. Otherwise, shoplifting won’t apply if the taking was done through an accident without any desire to deprive the store if the items.

Aside from being criminally liable for this offense, he is also civilly liable to the store owner for:

  • Damages $50 to $500
  • The value of the stolen product if it is not recovered in a sellable condition
  • Grand Theft– this is the stealing of property that amounts to $950 or more may be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor. Aggravating factors are your criminal history, the value of the item taken, whether a weapon was used, and the criminal sophistication necessary to commit the offense. Obviously, the more serious the crime, the more likely the crime will be charged as a felony. It is punishable by 16 months of imprisonment of up to 3 years depending on the severity of the crime.
  • Grand Theft Auto– many states including California enacted special statutes dealing with theft of motor vehicles also known as auto theft. Anyone caught stealing or attempting to steal a vehicle will be punished severely.

Common Theft Crimes in California:

  • Shoplifting or Petty theft
  • Petty theft with a Prior
  • Grand theft
  • Burglary
  • Robbery
  • Armed robbery
  • Carjacking
  • Vehicular theft
  • Larceny
  • Money Laundering
  • Credit Card Fraud
  • Identity theft

The crimes and penalties for theft vary based on the items stolen, its value, as well as the criminal record of the offender.

Are you facing charges of theft?

There are many kinds of theft and due to the severity of the consequences, consulting a criminal defense attorney well-versed in handling theft cases is important especially if you’re not certain of your specific situation. An experienced criminal defense lawyer will help you explore the defenses you may have, discuss your rights, safety plans and options available to you, as well as represent you in a criminal court if the case goes on trial. Call us now at the Law Offices of Marc Grossman for a free consultation.

Written by M. Grossman · Categorized: Criminal Defense

Nov 04 2019

Criminal Statutes of Limitations in California

Expiration of the statute of limitations is a common defense of some criminal defendants.  A statute of limitations is the time limit to sue the accused. In the criminal procedure process, this pertains to the period of time that the district attorney or prosecutor has to take legal action against a defendant. If the district attorney does not file the criminal cases within the applicable statute of limitations, charges against the defendant must be dismissed by the judge.

What is the Purpose of the Statutes of Limitations?

One main justification for a statute of limitations is the unfairness that a delayed trial may cause to the defendant.

The statute of limitations is set to make sure that defendants are also treated fairly.  Evidence to prove the defendant’s innocence to a crime may get lost or destroyed over time. There may be instances that witnesses who may help prove that the defendant did not commit the crime may either be no longer around to testify or they may have already forgotten the facts critical to help the defendant. As such, it becomes unfair to prosecute a person for criminal charges after a certain period of time has lapsed.

Criminal StatutesCalifornia’s criminal statute of limitations sets limits for how long a prosecutor may wait to file formal criminal charges. In most California crimes, time limits start on the day that the crimes were committed. There are exceptions such as child molestation cases, wherein the district attorney must first be made aware of the crime.

California applies a varied period on the statutes of limitation. In some instances, the criminal case must be filed within six years after the crime was committed. In some felonies, the deadline for filing a lawsuit is within three years after the crime was committed. On the other hand, most misdemeanor crimes must be filed within one year after the crime was committed.

As in other states, some crimes have no statute of limitations, meaning there is no time limit as to when the aggrieved party can file charges. A lawsuit can be filed at any time after the crime was committed. These are:

  • Offenses punishable by death such as felony-murder
  • Crimes punishable by life imprisonment in the state prison or incarceration without the possibility of parole (e.g., murder); and,
  • Embezzlement of public funds

Other time tables are as follows:

  • Offenses punishable by imprisonment for eight years or more (some exceptions apply): 6 years
  • Other offenses punishable by imprisonment (some exceptions): 3 years
  • Crimes committed against elders and dependent adults (except for theft or embezzlement): 5 years from the date of the offense
  • Offenses involving the production of pornographic material with minors: 10 years
  • Failure to register as a sex offender: 10 years
  • Misdemeanors: 1 year after the date of the offense
  • Crimes against children specifically misdemeanors committed upon a minor under the age of 14: 3 years from the date of the offense
  • Sexual offense by physician or therapist with the patient: 2 years

There is also a 4-year statute of limitations from discovery or date of the offense for the following:

  • If the offense is punishable by imprisonment and involves fraud or breach of  fiduciary duty
  • Theft or embezzlement if the victim is an elder or dependent adult
  • Misconduct in office by a public officer, employee, or appointee involving certain specified acts

What is “Tolling”?

“Tolling” or temporarily stopping the statutory limitations is possible in some cases. When a case is “tolled”, this means that the days do not count toward the final limit amount.  The statute of limitations is tolled in the following circumstances:

  • If the defendant is out of the state, up to a maximum of three years
  • If the defendant has a pending case in the state for the same crime.
  • Until the discovery of offense in cases involving procuring or offering a false or forged instrument for record in any public office or using someone else’s personal identifying information for any unlawful purpose
  • Until evidence is disclosed to the prosecution.

Are there exceptions to the rule on the statute of limitations?:

  • Certain felony sex crimes against victims under 18 may be commenced any time prior to the victim’s 28th birthday, or within 10 years after commission of the offense under certain conditions.
  • For child sexual abuse or sexual crime against a victim younger than 18 where the statute of limitations has run, the case can be commenced within 1 year of the date a report is filed with a state law enforcement agency, provided there is admissible, independent corroborating evidence
  • Sex crimes committed such as rape and sexual assault may be filed within one year of the date DNA evidence such as DNA match is used to establish the identity of the suspect
  • Certain misdemeanors relating to contractor and licensing violations under the Business and Professions Code have specified statutes of limitations ranging from one year to four years

Exceptions also apply if the crime can be charged either as a felony or a misdemeanor. In which case, the limitations period for these offenses will vary depending on the underlying offense under which the defendant will be prosecuted.

What is California’s Discovery Rule?

It is important to note that in certain offenses, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the offense has been, or could reasonably have been discovered. The Discovery Rule is used to determine when the statutory period for bringing criminal charges begins. The rule says that the SOL clock starts ticking as soon as an offense is discovered. As such, if a person committed a misdemeanor on March 6, 2019, but law enforcement did not know of the crime until February 22, 2021, they may file a lawsuit only until February 22, 2022.

Looking for legal assistance from a criminal defense lawyer in California?

If you’ve been charged with a crime, it’s always a smart move to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as you can so that you know what your options are.  A criminal lawyer can help build your defense especially if you have a chance to have your case dismissed if the statute of limitations has expired. Call Marc Grossman for a free initial consultation.

Written by M. Grossman · Categorized: Criminal Defense

Jan 27 2019

I Just Catfished My Ex. Is That A Crime?

Catfishing is a grave concern  in the online community where a person tricks another individual through chat, e-mail or with video software where the other person uses someone else’s identity. When the individual uses another person’s identity or persuades the target to participate in specific tasks, the crime of fraud is feasible and most likely to take place.

Did I Just Break the Law by Catfishing?

Acting like another person online is not prohibited on its own. Nonetheless, the activities of the instigator of catfishing normally participate in some type of prohibited task eventually. The individual with the phony account can participate in criminal activities like violation of copyright, defamation or impersonation with the use of another’s likeness, scams, sex-related infractions with minors or doing illegal activities with a minor. Practically anything the individual does may have lawful implications when she or he catfishes another person. If the criminal stays in another country, she or he may not experience legal consequences for these activities within that place.

If you are in California and feel that you may have participated in catfishing activities, do not delay.  Call one of the best lawyers in Upland, California. The criminal defense attorneys at the Law Office of Marc Grossman may be able to help you avoid criminal charges through a review of your case.

How is Catfishing Illegal? 

criminal defense Intellectual property infringement may take place with copyright violations where the individual makes use of copyright material. Claiming ownership, making use of various other IP to obtain something from the target or making use of the IP to access another thing may likewise begin fraudulent activities.  Pursuing a case versus the perpetrator of the catfishing is typically hard if she or he is not aware who it is or if the culprit cannot be uncovered. Nonetheless, with the help of an attorney, it is feasible to locate the individual and file a lawsuit such as a civil case, It is also possible to inform the local law enforcers in order to seek justice.

Is Fraud and Catfishing the Same?

The catfisher normally participates in fraudulence when she or he poses as another individual and also joins prohibited tasks to get something beneficial. This can consist of money, property, extra info from another person to commit other scams. The benefits are generally extracted from an individual through bank account information, cash or various other possessions of some type to hurt the target. If the individual is just posing as another person without any intention to take anything from the target, there is no criminal offense done.

I Did Not Ask for Any Money When I Catfished. Is It Still a Crime? 

If you participate in catfishing efforts to obtain cash or products from an individual, you are actually committing fraud. However, residents of other countries that take part in these tasks will certainly at some time generally request cash. It may be revealed through casual conversations where the person appeals to emotions of the target by saying he or she needs money to buy food, gas, or to help a sick family member. As soon an emotional connection is established with the target, the perpetrator will be able to obtain the cash or property out of the goodness of the heart of the target.

How Is A Catfisher Caught?

When the individual participating in catfishing commits criminal fraud, she or he may suffer legal consequences if the target has the ability to recognize who the catfisher is and speak to the authorities in taking the matter to court. This typically calls for the aid of a professional to investigate and locate the person. If the perpetrator is not in the country, the situation will prove more challenging. An international attorney may be necessary to help in such situations.

The victim may require to speak to the authorities as well as participate in collecting proof versus the catfisher. This is feasible with recording software application, talking with the specific individual and getting more information that will enable the police officers or district attorney to file a case of criminal fraud against the perpetrator. The greater number of proof collected, the higher the possibility of getting justice for the damage caused. Collaborating with the authorities as well as a district attorney will help the victim uncover the perpetrator and in so doing, help the authorities charge him or her for criminal fraud. Any loss of cash or property may call for information to hold the perpetrator accountable.

How Can I Defend Myself?

If you participated in catfishing and did not commit fraud but only used the name or picture of another individual, you may still need to secure the legal services of a criminal defense attorney to defend against fraud charges, even if no cash or property was involved. An experienced criminal defense attorney, such as our lawyers at the Law Offices of Marc Grossman could help.  Call us for a free initial consultation. Our criminal defense attorneys in California will fight for you. Contact us now.

Written by M. Grossman · Categorized: Criminal Defense

Dec 27 2018

Reforms in California Marijuana Law Gives Convicted People Fresh Start

Have you been convicted of marijuana-related charges in California?  Have you suffered from the consequences brought about by the criminal records that continue to haunt you? This good news might uplift your spirits. Even better, our Upland criminal defense attorneys can advise you on how this new law works and ensure you get full advantage of it.

Hailed by supporters as an opportunity for individuals get back to their normal lives, a new California legislation will certainly make it less complicated for individuals with previous marijuana convictions to get their records expunged entirely, or their sentences dramatically reduced.

Assembly Bill 1793-passed by an overwhelming majority in the California state Legislature as well as signed right int law Sunday evening by Gov. Jerry Brown will certainly simplify a formerly laborious procedure that made it challenging for locals with a previous marijuana-related sentence} to clear their names.

“This is transformative,” stated Rodney Holcombe of the Drug Policy Alliance, a nationwide organization, based in New York, that supports for human-rights driven drug policies. “This creates an opportunity for people reclaim their lives.”

California is not the very first state to retroactively permit those with marijuana convictions an opportunity to lower entirely eliminate their past; that distinction goes to Oregon, which legalized recreational weed in 2014. Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts as well as New Hampshire, plus the cities of San Francisco, Seattle and also San Diego, have legislations comparable} to Oregon, where people found guilty of some marijuana-related criminal activities — like possession, cultivation, or production– can work to obtain their records sealed or expunged.

However, California is the very first state to automate the system, which legislators, as well as bill advocates wish, will certainly be a game-changer for countless residents that have actually restricted accessibility to student loans, housing, as well as jobs,  because of their convictions.. The Judicial Council of California state, sat the very least,  218,000 residents would certainly gain from new legislation.

The action is  California’s most recent initiative to assist those with marijuana charges go on with their lives. Two years back, Californians passed  Proposition 64, which legalized recreational marijuana use for adults 21 and above and also permitted those with criminal convictions petition to have their records erased.  However, the process was time-consuming and complicated, requiring individuals to petition the courts to lower their sentence for previous convictions when marijuana was prohibited. It can likewise be a costly procedure, with expenses covering court fees, employing an attorney to walk individuals through paragraphs of complex legal jargon, as well as time spent away from work and homes.

The Drug Policy Alliance attempts to enlighten the general public on what it calls “collateral consequences,” the adverse effects that come from an often decades-old conviction, Holcombe claimed. Those collateral consequences can consist of not having the ability to get student loans, access to meaningful jobs or great housing, to name a few concerns.

Under the new legislation, the state will certainly do the job to clean up individuals’ records– even if they really did not understand they were qualified. Some people will be able to totally clear their record, while others will see their criminal offenses considerably reduced. Possession with the intent to sell, for instance, will now be reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor.

Beginning January 1, 2019, the  Department of Justice has seven months to assess all cannabis cases and also send out possible petitions to county district attorneys. DAs will have one year to challenge or approve the petition to change residents’ marijuana-related convictions. Top priority will be given to those presently serving time.

Support for legalizing marijuana has actually grown continuously over the last two decades in America. According to the Pew Research Center, just} 31 percent of adults in 2000 believed it needs to be legal.  Currently, that number is 61 percent.

In spite of opposition, Holcombe and the DPA are optimistic that if California’s landmark law succeeds, various other states might take the same steps.

“My hope is that this momentum can continue, and we can use California as  a guide on how to move forward.”

Talk to our Upland criminal defense attorneys on how to clear your records of marijuana possession convictions. Let us help you move forward to a better life.

Written by M. Grossman · Categorized: Criminal Defense · Tagged: California marijuana law, Marijuana use in California, Upland criminal defense attorneys

Sep 02 2015

Attorney Frees Victim of Gay Bashing Convicted of Murder

Attorney Marc Grossman Wins Freedom Of Convicted Murderer After 20 Years in Prison

After more than 20 years in prison and several failed attempts for parole, Attorney Marc Grossman of Upland, California was able free a victim of gay bashing convicted of murder in 1986.  Despite many state and federal court decisions concluding that Robert Rosenkrantz’s  constitutional rights of due process had been violated by California’s parole system by continuing to deny him parole after he had served more than the minimum length of his sentence, first Governor Grey Davis and then Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger had repeatedly denied Rosenkrantz the opportunity for parole until attorney Marc Grossman was able to secure his release.

Gay Bashing Precipitated the Murder

Rosenkrantz was just out of highschool and barely 18 years old in 1985.  It was a different time, when being gay was not an accepted social norm and coming out could expose you to bullying and other forms victimization especially if you were a high school student.  One night in June 1985, Rosenkrantz  was with a male companion in his parents’ beach house, when his younger brother Joey and a friend, Steven Redman, a classmate of Rosenkrantz, arrived to spy on him.  Redman had suspected that Rosenkrantz was gay and now Redman knew first hand.  Redman kicked in the door of the beach house and yelled, “Get the fuck out of here you faggots,” and then struck Rosenkrantz with the flashlight, breaking his nose.  Joey, was carrying a stun gun and burned his brother’s hand while attempting to use it on him. Rosenkrantz ran out to his car and retrieved a BB gun.  He used it to try to pin down Redman and Joey to prevent them from leaving the beach house.  Joey and Redman called Rosenkrantz’s father and, when he arrived, they told him that they had seen Rosenkrantz with another man engaged in a sex act.

Rosenkrantz insisted to his father he was not gay and that the two were mistaken, but his father, angry, threw him out of the house. Rosenkrantz was distraught after having been outed in such a callous manner. He spent a few days living in his car, where he became more and more upset with the recent events.  At some point he acquired an Uzi machine gun after which he confronted Redman and demanded that he take back what he had said to Rosenkrantz’s father.  Redman refused and continued to taunt and ridicule Rosenkrantz calling him “faggot” and making other disparaging remarks.   The teen was so angered by Redman’s actions that he shot him and killed him.

The Court Case

Prosecutors first sought a first degree murder, but understandably, the jury demonstrated empathy for Rosenkrantz, obviously recognizing that the teen was a victim of gay bashing.  The result was that Rosenkrantz was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to 15 years to life, plus two years for using a firearm.

Time in Prison

Rosenkrantz proved to be a model prisoner, compiling a perfect record, and earning two college degrees and a number of vocational certificates. He also completed every available therapy and counseling program and received stellar recommendations from prison officials in support of his applications for parole once he had served his minimum time.

Yet each time he attempted to be released on parole, he was ultimately rejected buy two different governors.  Rosenkrantz’s parole appeals became notorious in the California gay community, where many people came to understand the nature of the provocation and strain under which Rosenkrantz was operating at the young age of 18.

After a long and difficult battle, the state and federal courts both decided that by continuing to deny parole based entirely on the nature of the offense was depriving Rosenkrantz of his right to due process of law.  The governing statutes provided that a convict who has served the minimum time required under his sentence is entitled to release if his rehabilitation results in him no longer being a danger to the community. No one in the prison system presented a single piece of evidence that indicated Rosenkrantz posed an ongoing threat to the public.  In fact, Rosenkrantz’s own efforts to become college educated and to learn new trades demonstrated his ability to be a productive member of society and worthy of being released from prison.  The court saw that Rosenkrantz had accepted responsibility for what he had done, understood and acknowledged that it was wrong, and transformed himself to become a useful, non-threatening member of society and, therefore, should be released on parole.

This lead to the federal court and the California Supreme Court ordering Rosenkrantz to be released. Less than a week after the courts ruled in Rosenkrantz’s favor, he was released on parole to his parents who had long ago come to accept that their son was gay.  Upon his release he started a career in information technology.

There video related to this post is excerpted from a KCAL 9 interview with Criminal Defense Attorney shortly after the release of Rosenkrantz.  Today being homosexual, gay, lesbian, bi or transgender is widely accepted.  While the actions that Rosenkrantz took as a result of having been a victim of gay bashing were wrong, one must recognize that had the same events occurred today, the outcome would likely have been much different.

Attorney Marc Grossman is a supporter of gay rights and has represented many gay, lesbian and transgender people in actions to protect their rights, to assist them in divorces and to represent them in their unique criminal situation.

If you have been a victim of gay bashing or if you have been harassed by the police or government official because you are gay, lesbian or transgender the Law Offices of Marc Grossman can help.  If you are contemplating divorce, the Law Offices of Marc Grossman is one of the few experts in same sex marriage and same sex divorce.  We invite you to call us at 855-LOMG-911 or complete one of the many contact forms that you will find on our website, wefight4you.com. We are here to help.

Written by M. Grossman · Categorized: Child Custody, Child Support, Criminal Defense, Discrimination & Harassment, Divorce, Family Law, Front Page Content, Gay Bashing, Same Sex Divorce, Same Sex Marriage, Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Request a Call or Free Consultation

We will take the time to answer all of your legal questions. Free. No Obligation. No Pressure. Just Answers.

    Office Address: 100 N Euclid Ave #201,
    Upland, CA 91786

    Phone: Main Office Phone #: (909) 608-7426
    Workers Comp Phone #: (855) 566-4911
    New Client Hotline: 855-LOMG-911

    Email: [email protected]

    Marc Grossman on Social Media

    Locations We Serve:

    Alta Loma, Claremont, Chino, Chino Hills, Corona, Diamond Bar, Fontana, Glendora, La Verne, Mira Loma, Montclair, Ontario, Palm Desert, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Dimas, Upland, Van Nuys

    Copyright © 2026 Law Offices of Marc Grossman, LLP  lDisclaimerlPrivacy policylAdvantage Attorney Marketing & Cloud Solutions